| Welcome to PJTV | Register | Sign in | |
| Home Become a Member Support | Welcome to PJTV | Register | Sign in |
| Video Transcript Font size – All right, let's keep on with the digging and see if we can uncover the mystery of possible real live superheroes. If you haven't seen the episodes before this one, I recommend that you do so it'll make sense. It would be hard to understand, like somebody who's never heard of Bruce Jenner and seeing him for the first time on Vanity Magazine. It'd be like, Vanity thinks this woman looks good enough to be on the cover? Why? This doesn't make sense. So I hope you all will do a little ZoNation binge watching. (hard rock music) Y'all, I know, you want me to talk about politics. I can dig it. I kind of just want to talk about some other stuff while we still have the free speech to do so. In the previous ZoNation, we were discussing the Book of Jude to try to conclude whether or not the Sons of God were good or bad. The popular view is that these angels committed an abomination and were fallen angels, even though Genesis 6:2 doesn't say they were fallen angels, it calls them the Sons of God. Giving them a totally different nature than the people described in Sodom and Gomorrah in Jude 1:6-7. Sons of God being interested only in women for marriage and having children is a totally different nature than what people were doing in Sodom and Gomorrah, who were engaged in all kinds of sexual perversions, including bestiality, as it says they pursued strange flesh. The people's motives were the pursuit of perverse self-indulgence, not to have children. An abomination concerning sex is when you have sex with what you're not designed to procreate with. If angels are able to procreate with humans, that's not an abomination. And if angels marrying human women were as detestable as you think it is, you'd think that God would have included it in His ordinance of thou shalt not have sex with chart. And God covers a broad enough area for you to say, "Okay, I get the picture." From don't have sex with your parents, or don't have sex with family members at the same time, and don't be having sex with animals, et cetera. (upbeat music) But despite that detailed list of whom or what God says to not have sex with, it doesn't tell the women that they cannot be married to angels. But people want to believe a marrying angel is a fallen angel, an angel that became a husband and a father. A big problem in America that is speeding our fall is the amount of kids growing up without a father and being born out of wedlock. But you want to see the angels as evil because they actually married the women and then had children. So an angel who's a husband and a father equals fallen? I really don't get that. These so-called fallen angels sound more like they stepped up more than the deadbeat, absentee, so-called dad's today. So the attitude that angels who married the women and then had children is that they're somehow evil. And that attitude is also directed at the children they had known as the Nephilim. I get people telling me on one side that the Nephilim means the giants. On the other side, they insist that the Nephilim were the fallen. I got this nutty idea, instead of going by what you think the Nephilim means, I'm just gonna go by what God says about them. He says the Nephilim became the heroes of old and great renown. And I'll say the same thing about them, that sounds more like they stepped up than fell down. That is what God told Moses to say about them. It doesn't sound like God was saying them rotten kids of those punk, rebellious, good-for-nothing, mosquito wing, so-called angels. No, He called those angels His Sons and He called their children the heroes of old and great renown. I get folks telling me that according to Hebrew scholars the Nephilim means the giants, and the others say the Hebrew scholars say it means the fallen. Now, y'all, I'm a supporter of Israel. The Hebrew scholars will also tell you that Jesus ain't the Messiah. Should I believe that too? So should I accept every assertion of a scholar? Scholars looked right into the face of God, spat in His face, and hung Him on a cross. So I don't buy every word of a scholar just because they're a scholar. It's funny, these same people will tell me, "You need to think for yourself, Zo," and when I research stuff for myself, even after considering a scholar's take, I'm told to listen to scholars when I was just told to think for myself. So just really quick, let's examine what these elitist-minded egotists really mean. "You need to think for yourself, Zo," which means, "You need to think like me. "'Cause if you're not thinking like me, "then you're not thinking for yourself. "And if your opinion doesn't match mine, "then you haven't done your research." Get over yourself. All right? Anyway, I know for a lot of y'all, you still want to see the Sons of God as evil because according to the dubious writings of the Book of Enoch, they taught human beings how to make stuff to kill each other with. Dude, Cain killed Abel like it ain't no thing. Mankind did not have to be taught by fallen angels how to kill. The Bible didn't say that Tubal-cain had to be taught by fallen angels on how to forge things out of bronze and iron, like it says in the Book of Enoch, when they taught men how to make weapons out of metals. The Book of Enoch implicates the Nephilim as giants who fed on the blood of humans when they ran out of animals to eat. That's a stark difference from them being described as heroes in Genesis. Many blame the Nephilim for God flooding the world. The Bible clearly says that the reason why God flooded the world was because of the wickedness of man. It doesn't say it was because of the Sons of God, it doesn't say it was because of their Sons, the Nephilim. It clearly states that it was because of man. God determined that the thoughts of man, in his own free will thoughts, were wicked. God didn't say that He was sorry or angry about the Sons of God having children. God said He was sorry that He, as in Himself, was sorry that He made man. Nothing puts the Nephilim at fault. God calls out man. God was so broken hearted about the wickedness of man that God destroyed everything that breathed: men, women, children, every kind of animal that crawled on the ground, all the birds of the air, all destroyed except He didn't destroy the Nephilim. But the Bible says that the Nephilim existed before the flood and after. Could it be that the Nephilim were every bit the heroes that God said that they were and He let them live past the flood? Because His issue was with man and the animals under his dominion, not the Nephilim. While y'all contemplate that, the Book of Enoch suggests that Noah, himself, was a Nephilim. It says he was born with white hair and snow white and red skin and his eyes were beautiful and illuminated the whole house. His father said, "He's not human, instead he is like "the children of angels." Then the Book of Enoch goes on to say that an angel wasn't the daddy, it was actually Lamech. But the interesting thing is, is that Lamech appears to know what the Nephilim looks like to make the comparison and it doesn't sound like the Nephilim babies were little beady-eyed monsters with six fingers and six toes. I think Lamech would have pointed that out if the Book of Enoch was really as consistent, I guess. And what's even more sad is that you have some Afrocentrics out there who use that to say that Noah is the progenator of the cursed white race, who were spawned by the abominable union of fallen angels with human women. And then, they just totally ignore the fact that the Book of Enoch retracts the implication and says that Noah wasn't the child of a fallen angel at all but the son of Lamech. All the more reason why I don't go by what the Book of Enoch says. Anyway, I'm Alfonzo Rachel with ZoNation, thanks for watching these vids I'm doing in this series. I hope you'll check out the article on my idea. The link is provided in the description box. (loud rock riff) Thou shalt not have sex with chart. |